Mailing-List: contact jdo-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Message-ID: <17981359.1155251655451.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Craig Russell (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Updated: (JDO-405) recursion-depth - fetching the whole
 graph with 0 or -1?
In-Reply-To: <18361633.1155112993825.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-405?page=all ]

Craig Russell updated JDO-405:
------------------------------

    Fix Version/s: JDO 2 maintenance release 1

> recursion-depth - fetching the whole graph with 0 or -1?
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JDO-405
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-405
>             Project: JDO
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: JDO 2 final
>            Reporter: Ilan Kirsh
>             Fix For: JDO 2 maintenance release 1
>
>
> In page 124: "A value of -1 means that the recursion-depth is not limited by traversing this field."
> In page 127: "A recursion-depth of 0 will fetch the whole graph of instances reachable from this field"
> Is there a difference between these two?
> In addition, I think that -1 / 0 as a default might be better than 1 it terms of performance, because tracking such cycles has some overhead, which we might not want to pay for most fields in which this feature is not needed (and MaxFetchDepth is sufficient).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira