db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Craig Russell (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JDO-377) Company model factory improvements to test persistent interfaces
Date Tue, 02 May 2006 00:16:47 GMT
    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-377?page=comments#action_12377300 ] 

Craig Russell commented on JDO-377:

I won't commit this for the final JDO 2.0 tck release. I'm sure JPOX have their hands full
making the official 1.1.0 release.

> Company model factory improvements to test persistent interfaces
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>          Key: JDO-377
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-377
>      Project: JDO
>         Type: Improvement

>   Components: tck20
>     Versions: JDO 2 rc1
>     Reporter: Craig Russell
>     Priority: Minor
>      Fix For: JDO 2 maintenance release 1
>  Attachments: JDO-377-mbo.patch, JDO-377.patch, LifecycleCompleteness.java, lifecyclecompleteness.conf
> Please review this patch.
> In order to test persistent interfaces better, a method was added to the CompanyFactory
interface to allow the test program to get the persistent instances. 
> List getAllInstances();
> To implement this new API, changes were made to the factory implementation classes to
keep track of instances as they were created.
> Additionally, only classes (or interfaces) actually instantiated were put into the tearDown
class array. So Person.class and Employee.class were removed from the array.
> Finally, a bug was fixed in CompanyFactoryPMClass where the interface IMedicalInsurance.class
was incorrectly added to the tearDown class array.
> A new test class was used for testing. This class might be added to the TCK if suitable.
> And a new configuration was used for testing. 

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
For more information on JIRA, see:

View raw message