Mailing-List: contact jdo-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <1142459994.44188e5adfdfd@webmail.jpox.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 13:59:54 -0800
From: Erik Bengtson <erik@jpox.org>
To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
References: <49D83A14-B322-48EC-85A8-3951BEC7D731@Sun.COM>
 <1142371266.441733c2a679f@webmail.jpox.org>
 <8D762E1E-AC77-4D9D-9983-6C2C12CF285D@Sun.COM>
 <1142381086.44175a1e30573@webmail.jpox.org>
In-Reply-To: <1142381086.44175a1e30573@webmail.jpox.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.3
Subject: Re: JPOX issues
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi,

All issues in JPOX were solved but not the ones related to the newInstance
tests.

> It's not clear to me in what state must be the instance created by this
> method.

Can someone answer this?

Quoting Erik Bengtson <erik@jpox.org>:

> Craig,
>
> It's not clear to me in what state must be the instance created by this
> method.
> Can you clarify?
>
> Thanks
>
> Quoting Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@Sun.COM>:
>
> > Hi Erik,
> >
> > On Mar 14, 2006, at 1:21 PM, Erik Bengtson wrote:
> >
> > > Can someone with spring understanding check JDO-327 ?
> >
> > Your symptom is different from mine. Have you checked in all the code
> > that gives you the error on pm.newInstance(IDentalInsurance.class) ?
> >
> > >
> > > With me
> > > JDO-241
> > > JDO-246 (Issue in derby, needs workaround implemented in JPOX)
> > > JDO-337 (to be fixed tonight)
> > >
> > > Work not started
> > > JDO-326 (abstract class support)
> >
> > Note that this is not abstract class support. The parameter is a
> > concrete class. "All the implementation has to do" is to recognize
> > that the parameter is PersistenceCapable, and call the jdoNewInstance
> > () method that's enhanced into the class.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Craig
> > >
> > >
> > > Quoting Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@Sun.COM>:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I'm looking at JDO JIRA issues 241, 246, 326, 327, and 337, and I'm
> > >> assuming that these issues are being looked at by the JPOX folks.
> > >>
> > >> Please correct me if there's some TCK activity needed here.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >> Craig
> > >>
> > >> Craig Russell
> > >> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/
> > >> jdo
> > >> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> > >> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Craig Russell
> > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> > 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> >
> >
>
>
>
>