Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-jdo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 74613 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2006 04:18:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2006 04:18:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 272 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2006 04:18:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jdo-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list jdo-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 261 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2006 04:18:22 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:18:22 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [192.87.106.226] (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:18:21 -0800 Received: from ajax (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ajax.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96FE1D49FE for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 04:18:00 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <1016129720.1142482680615.JavaMail.jira@ajax> Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 04:18:00 +0000 (GMT) From: "Craig Russell (JIRA)" To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (JDO-299) Signature test needed checking compliance of implementations with JDO2.0 API In-Reply-To: <1134851442.1139583836028.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-299?page=comments#action_12370637 ] Craig Russell commented on JDO-299: ----------------------------------- The patch contains the maven.xml patch twice. I assume that the project.properties actually sets the value of the signaturetest file? The signature.conf has the wrong description. Is there a way to only run the signature test once, since it's no value to run with both app identity and ds identitiy. SignatureTest comment need not refer to JDO 2.0, as it's generic. When we update the spec to e.g. 2.0.1 or 2.1, we won't need to change this class, but just update the reference signature file. You might define an additional SignatureTest constructor that has an explicit classloader argument. If not specified, the default is the classloader that you define here: classLoader = this.getClass().getClassLoader(). Then the comment "Tests the signature of classes (in the classpath) " would change to "Tests the signature of classes (in the specified classloader) ". After you check this in, please file a JIRA on the three exceptions. > Signature test needed checking compliance of implementations with JDO2.0 API > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JDO-299 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-299 > Project: JDO > Type: Task > Components: tck20 > Reporter: Martin Zaun > Assignee: Martin Zaun > Priority: Minor > Fix For: JDO 2 final > Attachments: JUnitSignatureTest.java, SignatureTest.java, api20_defs.txt, signature_test_final_review.zip, sigtest.patch > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira