db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael Watzek (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JDO-311) Inheritance3 : should check if the JDO implementation supports "javax.jdo.option.mapping.RelationSubclassTable"
Date Wed, 01 Mar 2006 11:13:44 GMT
    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-311?page=comments#action_12368259 ] 

Michael Watzek commented on JDO-311:
------------------------------------

I agree with 1. above. 
The removal of the package prefix in 2. above is consistent with other TCK test cases: All
calls of method "printUnsupportedOptionalFeatureNotTested" in TCK test classes pass a non-qualified
classnames. For this reason, I propose to pass a non-qualified classname here either, or to
adapt the calls in other TCK test cases as well.
Please let me know how to proceed.


> Inheritance3 : should check if the JDO implementation supports "javax.jdo.option.mapping.RelationSubclassTable"
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: JDO-311
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-311
>      Project: JDO
>         Type: Bug
>   Components: tck20
>     Versions: JDO 2 beta
>     Reporter: Andy Jefferson
>     Assignee: Michael Watzek
>      Fix For: JDO 2 final
>  Attachments: JDO-311.patch
>
> The inheritance3 test should check whether PMF.supportedOptions contains "javax.jdo.option.mapping.RelationSubclassTable"
before running the test. JPOX doesn't support this option yet the test still runs (and fails)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Mime
View raw message