db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michelle Caisse <Michelle.Cai...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Assertion coverage of detachment tests
Date Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:36:08 GMT
Hi Martin,

It would be great if you could add anything that you know is missing, as 
a range of assertion numbers or a set of ranges.  Then I could check it 
against the spreadsheet and make sure we have all tested assertions 
marked "yes".

Thanks,
Michelle

Martin Zaun wrote:

>
> Hi Michelle,
> got a question on the detachment and persistent-nontransactional
> assertions.  I've seen your additions to the spreadsheet and your
> JDO-273 and JDO-258 comments for the StateTransition[ReturnedObjects]
> tests to reflect the added assertions.
>
> So far, the StateTransition tests only refer to the State Transition
> table (assertion A5.9-1 following), not to any additional assertions
> on state transitions described in the text, which, I think, are all
> covered by the table (since it's a full matrix).
>
> I could add additional references to the test classes for the detached
> and persistent-nontransactional lifecycle assertions, but wouldn't we
> then have to do this for all the other states too ?
>
> Thx,
> Martin



Mime
View raw message