db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jörg von Frantzius <joerg.von.frantz...@artnology.com>
Subject Re: makePersistent detached instance deleted on database
Date Sat, 11 Mar 2006 16:30:20 GMT
Andy Jefferson schrieb:
>> I'm afraid this calls out for good old attachCopy(), only with an 
>> additional parameter:
> -1
> attachCopy() was removed for a good reason - simplification.
I wouldn't call it a simplification if folding a method into another 
causes a logical blurp in the target method. In my opinion that's the 
case when the same method sometimes has copy semantics and sometimes 
doesn't, and when it's return values aren't needed at all in the 
non-copying case. Even more so as the non-copying case is the most 
widely used one, forcing people to wonder what they might need the 
return value for, only to find out that they don't need it at all. 
That's hard to understand from most users' point of view.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message