db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Craig Russell (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JDO-299) Signature test needed checking compliance of implementations with JDO2.0 API
Date Thu, 09 Mar 2006 17:58:40 GMT
    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-299?page=comments#action_12369683 ] 

Craig Russell commented on JDO-299:
-----------------------------------

DataStoreCache ok.
JDOConnection ok.
Extent ok.
FetchPlan should verify the values of the static fields.
Do you intend to test the "implements" clause of the interfaces?
In general, I think we should not verify protected or private methods.
XXXIdentity ok
Reviewed up to but not including InstanceCallbacks.


> Signature test needed checking compliance of implementations with JDO2.0 API
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: JDO-299
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-299
>      Project: JDO
>         Type: Task
>   Components: tck20
>     Reporter: Martin Zaun
>     Assignee: Martin Zaun
>     Priority: Minor
>      Fix For: JDO 2 final
>  Attachments: api20_defs.txt
>


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Mime
View raw message