db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erik Bengtson <e...@jpox.org>
Subject Re: [spec comment] jdoNewInstance
Date Mon, 06 Mar 2006 18:48:27 GMT
Craig,

I thought it was a correction rather than an item to discuss. See spec 21.20

Quoting Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@Sun.COM>:

> Hi Erik,
>
> If the spec were still open, I'd agree to discuss it. But it isn't. :-
> ( We can look at this for a future revision.
>
> By the way, the rationale was that it's less work in the enhancer to
> generate the code, but I admit the rationale is weak. But either way,
> it's a matter of the implementation checking for null or catching a
> NullPointerException versus catching a JDOFatalInternalException. I'd
> guess it's a "startup cost".
>
> Craig
>
> On Mar 6, 2006, at 7:28 AM, Erik Bengtson wrote:
>
> >
> > 7.5
> > "If the class is abstract, null is returned."
> >
> > but should be "If the class is abstract, a
> > JDOFatalInternalException is thrown."
> >
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>




Mime
View raw message