db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jörg von Frantzius <joerg.von.frantz...@artnology.com>
Subject Re: Public DTD at http://java.sun.com/dtd/jdo_2_0.dtd
Date Tue, 21 Feb 2006 13:43:23 GMT
Sorry I was confused by the error message that sounded like I had to 
define the fetch-depth in my meta-data, i.e. that my meta-data was 
missing it. Stupid me. Or how would

    'Attribute "fetch-depth" must be declared for element type "field"'

sound to you, if you had never seen it before?

Andy Jefferson schrieb:
>> currently JPOX' metadata parsing complains that 'Attribute "fetch-depth" 
>> must be declared for element type "field" ' for metadata that doesn't 
>> have fetch-depth anymore in fetch-groups fields' definitions.
> Not for me it doesn't. Please define your input data and version of JPOX
> Core/Enhancer.
>> How up-to-date is the public DTD supposed to be? Or should I rather 
>> somehow try to refer to the DTD that is coming with JPOX?
> When JPOX finds the "standard" DTD definition it utilises its own copy of the DTD
> (which is typically as up-to-date if not more than that in Apache JDO). It
> already has recursion-depth and has for several days.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message