db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Watzek <mwa.t...@spree.de>
Subject Re: Question concerning run rules
Date Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:08:03 GMT
Hi Craig, Michael,

good idea!

Regards,
Michael

Craig L Russell wrote:
> I'd second the motion that the TCK ORM should use native instead of 
> identity. It's the default, so we can just remove the strategy entirely.
> 
> Craig
> 
> On Feb 15, 2006, at 1:20 PM, Michael Bouschen wrote:
> 
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> would it make sense if the TCK ORM files for datastore identity use 
>> the strategy "native" instead of "identity"?
>>
>> Regards Michael
>>
>>> Hi Craig,
>>>
>>> the run rules state, that the .orm files must not be changed by JDO 
>>> vendors.
>>>
>>> The ORM for datastore identity specifies strategy "identity". Can a 
>>> JDO implementation, which only supports datastore identity and which 
>>> only runs on a RDBMS that has sequences and no identity columns, 
>>> successfully pass the TCK without changing the ORM?
>>>
>>> Would it make sense to allow such vendors to change the ORM for 
>>> datastore identity in order to specify strategy "sequence"?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Michael
>>
>>
>>
>> --Michael Bouschen        Tech@Spree Engineering GmbH
>> mailto:mbo.tech@spree.de    http://www.tech.spree.de/
>> Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33        Buelowstr. 66           
>> Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012        D-10783 Berlin           
>>
> 
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> 


-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Watzek                  Tech@Spree Engineering GmbH
mailto:mwa.tech@spree.de        Buelowstr. 66
Tel.:  ++49/30/235 520 36       10783 Berlin - Germany
Fax.:  ++49/30/217 520 12       http://www.spree.de/
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Mime
View raw message