db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Jordan" <davej...@bellsouth.net>
Subject RE: Associations with attributes/roles
Date Sun, 26 Feb 2006 19:41:05 GMT

The hype is EJB3 because the EJB 3 community is busy writing articles about
it. Some I have read make it sound like object persistence is brand new,
such BS. Those backing JDO need to start writing articles about JDO 2.0 and
when EJB 3 is finalized, it would be great to have articles that do a
side-by-side comparison of the two standards.

David Jordan
Object Identity, Inc.


-----Original Message-----
From: erik@jpox.org [mailto:erik@jpox.org] 
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 2:19 PM
To: 'Apache JDO project'; 'JDO Expert Group'
Subject: RE: Associations with attributes/roles

Eric,

> I agree we could always find a mapping that would solve that particular
> case.
> But should we do it?

IMO, yes. In the past, I perceived JDO been promoted to cope with any model.
I propose this mapping be standardized in future releases, of course, if
vendors will continue to invest in JDO, JPOX will.

Nowadays, the hype is EJB3.



Mime
View raw message