db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release jdo2 beta
Date Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:57:35 GMT
Hi Dan,

Thanks for the helpful tips.

On Jan 14, 2006, at 9:52 PM, Daniel John Debrunner wrote:

> Craig L Russell wrote:
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> Thanks for the advice. This is my first release.
>>
>> What we are trying to release is several jar files from the jdo2  
>> project
>> plus a source download. I'll stage these on my apache.org/~clr site
>> along with instructions on what to do with them.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean here, Apache releases are distributed from
> Apache mirrors, not from people's home directories on Apache servers.

This paragraph refers to the staging of the release that will be on  
my home directory. The release itself clearly is published elsewhere.
>
>> Since the tck is a requirement for claiming compatibility with JSR  
>> 243,
>> we need to distribute its sources. But the rest of the  
>> dependencies are
>> distributed as binaries accessible via maven.
>>
>> So what would you like to see here? We've started the release  
>> process,
>> and need a vote to make the components available on the Apache web  
>> site.
>> Clearly I can make the binaries available as a maven repository in my
>> ~clr web site but the other part is the process of getting people
>> comfortable with the release process itself.
>
> When Derby was getting started I found the HTTP server release
> guidelines very useful:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/release.html
>
> The HTTP guidelines do talk about source only as a release, but with
> Java projects you don't have the issue of multiple binaries, so a
> release can include the binary (jar files as well).
>
> Derby has a release process on its wiki:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbySnapshotOrRelease
>
> I think the point is that a release is what the JDO project wants to
> distribute through the Apache mirrors. People need to vote on the  
> actual
> tar/zip that will be posted, not just on a state of the svn  
> respository.

The actual tar/zip needs to be available somewhere, which is what I  
plan to stage on my home directory.

> For example Derby had some issues with a release where something like
> the scripts files bundled in the jar files did not have execute
> permission, something that was obvious when people tried out the  
> release
> to-be, but maybe not from svn.

Thanks for this example.

Craig
>
> Hope this helps,
> Dan.
>
>

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


Mime
View raw message