db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael Bouschen (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JDO-188) Add tests for static JDOHelper.getObjectIds methods
Date Sat, 29 Oct 2005 16:35:01 GMT
    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-188?page=comments#action_12356278 ] 

Michael Bouschen commented on JDO-188:

The patch looks good. 

Just one remark: the localSetUp method creates a second PM which is not closed in the test
case. Should we add a localTearDown method coling this PM?

> Add tests for static JDOHelper.getObjectIds methods
> ---------------------------------------------------
>          Key: JDO-188
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-188
>      Project: JDO
>         Type: Test
>   Components: tck20
>  Environment: TCK
>     Reporter: Craig Russell
>     Assignee: Craig Russell
>  Attachments: jdo-188.patch
> A8.3-11 [static Object[] getObjectIds (Object[] pcs); static Collection getObjectIds
(Collection pcs); These methods return the JDO identities of the parameter instances. For
each instance in the parameter, the getObjectId method is called. They return one identity
instance for each persistence-capable instance in the parameter. The order of iteration of
the returned Collection exactly matches the order of iteration of the parameter Collection].
> The test case api.persistencemanager.GetObjectIds needs a test method per API. 
> The setUp method creates 50 persistent instances of type PCPoint and stores the ids in
an ArrayList and the instances in a separate ArrayList. The test case call getObjectIds and
verify that the object ids returned match the objects ids that are in the list.
> There are no negative tests.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
For more information on JIRA, see:

View raw message