db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Removed DetachOnClose property is still present in spec
Date Sun, 25 Sep 2005 18:08:52 GMT
Hi Matthew,

Yes, this is one of three places that DetachOnClose still exists in  
the PFD.

Please see my message of 23-Sep 7:26 AM PDT. I've already updated my  
working draft but it's not public yet. But please consider it gone ^ 3.

Thanks,

Craig

On Sep 23, 2005, at 11:59 AM, Matthew T. Adams wrote:

> I think that section 5.5.4 of the PFD needs to be updated to  
> reflect that
> the property DetachOnClose is gone.  It currently reads:
>
> <spec>
> A hollow instance transitions to detached if its persistence  
> manager is
> closed while
> the DetachOnClose property is true.
> </spec>
>
> This is not possible since there is no property DetachOnClose.
>
> --matthew
>
> Matthew T. Adams
> Corporate Technical Advisor & Senior Consultant
> Mobile:  +1 253 732 1051
> Phone:  +1 206 331 3833
> Fax:  +1 815 331 0952
> matthew.adams@xcalia.com
> P.O. Box 24163
> Federal Way, WA  98093
> www.xcalia.com
>
>
>
> Xcalia makes implementing SOA easy with agile business intermediation
> software that combines heterogeneous data with services to easily  
> develop
> and deploy transactional composite applications.  Enterprises can  
> quickly
> respond to changing business requirements and dramatically reduce  
> the costs
> of data access and service integration.
>
>
>

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


Mime
View raw message