Mailing-List: contact jdo-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 11:38:04 -0700
From: Michelle Caisse <Michelle.Caisse@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: JDO-61
In-reply-to: <200506091825.10242.andy@jpox.org>
To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Message-id: <42A88C8C.1040709@sun.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="Boundary_(ID_VXKu+gFp3ELJIfBzBEzQbQ)"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.2)
 Gecko/20040803
References: <AE35ED93-EC34-41DA-BC07-E3E083A789D5@Sun.COM>
 <200506091050.47817.andy@jpox.org> <42A86B9F.9050808@sun.com>
 <200506091825.10242.andy@jpox.org>

--Boundary_(ID_VXKu+gFp3ELJIfBzBEzQbQ)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

Yup, it passes on the first run with a clean database, but if you run 
the same test a second time it fails.  I've added a comment to the JIRA.

-- Michelle

Andy Jefferson wrote:

>>Is there anything in cvs but not in the latest build that would cause
>>this test to pass?
>>
>>Are you running with the same jdo properties that we do (checked into
>>test/conf)?
>>    
>>
>
>What I use is :-
>Apache JDO : SVN
>JPOX : CVS
>
>I changed a few things in extent handling this morning but nothing of 
>significance that would affect the creation of the SELECT for the iterator.
>
>What I run is :-
>maven clean database -Dtest=extents.InstancesPersistedPriorToIterationReturned 
>runtck.single
>
>
>runtck.single:
>    [echo] Run TCK test 
>org.apache.jdo.tck.extents.InstancesPersistedPriorToIterationReturned on the 
>IUT with 
>configuration /home/andy/work/jdo/trunk/tck20/test/conf/datastoreidentity.conf
>    [java] RUN InstancesPersistedPriorToIterationReturned.test
>    [java] Time: 26.204
>    [java] OK (1 test)
>
>
>If you wish to investigate the issue you could just look in the JPOX log. The 
>only issue is the ordering of the INSERT (of the additional object) and the 
>SELECT (for the Extent). I get the INSERT before the SELECT when I run as 
>above.
>
>
>  
>


--Boundary_(ID_VXKu+gFp3ELJIfBzBEzQbQ)--