Mailing-List: contact jdo-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
From: Andy Jefferson <andy@jpox.org>
Organization: Java Persistent Objects JDO
To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: Re: JDO-61
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 10:50:47 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
References: <AE35ED93-EC34-41DA-BC07-E3E083A789D5@Sun.COM>
In-Reply-To: <AE35ED93-EC34-41DA-BC07-E3E083A789D5@Sun.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200506091050.47817.andy@jpox.org>

> After I fixed the extent iteration outside a transaction, it appears
> that JPOX fails test InstancesPersistedPriorToIterationReturned
> because it doesn't include a new instance in the iteration.
>
> Could you please look at JDO-61?

Hi Craig,

I ran that test on its own - for both datastore identity and application 
identity (with latest CVS of JPOX). It passed.


runtck.single:
    [echo] Run TCK test 
org.apache.jdo.tck.extents.InstancesPersistedPriorToIterationReturned on the 
IUT with 
configuration /home/andy/work/jdo/trunk/tck20/test/conf/applicationidentity.conf
    [java] RUN InstancesPersistedPriorToIterationReturned.test
    [java] Time: 20.749
    [java] OK (1 test)


-- 
Andy
Java Persistent Objects JDO - JPOX