db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Watzek <mwa.t...@spree.de>
Subject Re: JDO-58
Date Wed, 01 Jun 2005 16:30:51 GMT
Hi Craig,

>>> And we should probably disallow pmf == null in cases where there is 
>>> work to do.
>> I'm not sure. Do you mean that the test result is ERROR for test cases 
>> having "pmf == null in cases where there is work to do"? Let me know 
>> if you feel strong on this.
> I think so. Since this is a new feature, any test case that uses 
> tearDown methods should leave the PMF open. Can you think of a case 
> where this is not true?
No. My question is: Do we want to *force* test cases to leave the PMF 
open when they add tear down instances and/or classes?


View raw message