db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: InstanceCallbacks
Date Wed, 30 Mar 2005 21:06:27 GMT
Hi Matthew,

Good point. They absolutely should be removed, as they serve only to 
confuse.

Do you have your commit merit badge yet? If not, I'll do it.

Craig

On Mar 30, 2005, at 11:51 AM, Matthew T. Adams wrote:

> Why are we leaving any methods in InstanceCallbacks?  The latest svn
> code has them, even though they are now coming from the various 
> listener
> interfaces.  Am I missing something?  I don't think we need them, even
> for backward compatibility issues since they're coming from the other
> interfaces.
>
> --matthew
>
> Matthew T. Adams
> Corporate Technical Advisor & Senior Consultant
> Mobile:  +1 253 732 1051
> Phone:  +1 206 331 3833
> Fax:  +1 360 937 9616
> matthew.adams@xcalia.com
> P.O. Box 24163
> Federal Way, WA  98093
> www.xcalia.com
>
>
>
> Xcalia helps businesses address the challenge of Enterprise Information
> Access in a heterogeneous environment.  We provide products and 
> services
> that facilitate the two-way exchange of information between 
> individuals,
> mission-critical applications, and databases.  Our customers enjoy
> improved performance, reduced operating and development costs, faster
> time to market, and rejuvenated legacy systems.
>
>
>
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Mime
View raw message