db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: TCK: object id class
Date Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:19:55 GMT
Hi Erik, Andy, David,

If you have not done so, please subscribe to this alias. The changes to 
tck11  were announced on this alias and future changes to api20, tck20 
will be announced as well.

Thanks,

Craig

On Mar 29, 2005, at 9:04 AM, Michelle Caisse wrote:

> Hi, Erik,
>
> You must be using the repository from the wiki.  Michael checked the 
> JDO 1.1 files into the Apache subversion repository about a week ago 
> and the problem is fixed there.  Please try it and let me know if you 
> still have any problems.
>
> I think we didn't announce the check-in.  My apologies.  I am working 
> on getting the 2.0 project ready for check-in and I will send email 
> when that happens.
>
> BTW, I moved this thread to the jdo-dev alias.
>
> -- Michelle
>
> erik@jpox.org wrote:
>
>> The ID(String) constructors for the inner classes in the fieldtypes 
>> package are
>> not correct too.
>>
>> Quoting erik@jpox.org:
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Some of the object id classes in the tck do not override toString 
>>> and neither
>>> provide a constructor with String argument or implement Serializable
>>> interface.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Mime
View raw message