db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michelle Caisse <Michelle.Cai...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: TCK: object id class
Date Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:10:55 GMT
Yes, that's right.  We discovered it building with jpox.  -- Michelle

erik@jpox.org wrote:

>By the way, this is there since the JDOTCK 1.
>
>Erik Bengtson 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: erik@jpox.org [mailto:erik@jpox.org] 
>Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 9:07 PM
>To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>Subject: RE: TCK: object id class
>
>Michelle,
> 
>I just got the latest version and the constructor taking String does not
>correspond to the toString
> 
>        public Oid(String s) { identifier = Integer.parseInt(s); }
> 
>        public String toString() { return this.getClass().getName() + ":
>"  + identifier;}
> 
>Regards,
> 
>Erik Bengtson
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Michelle Caisse [mailto:Michelle.Caisse@Sun.COM] 
>Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 7:04 PM
>To: erik@jpox.org
>Cc: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>Subject: Re: TCK: object id class
> 
>Hi, Erik,
>
>You must be using the repository from the wiki.  Michael checked the JDO
>1.1 files into the Apache subversion repository about a week ago and the
>problem is fixed there.  Please try it and let me know if you still have
>any problems.
>
>I think we didn't announce the check-in.  My apologies.  I am working on
>getting the 2.0 project ready for check-in and I will send email when
>that happens.
>
>BTW, I moved this thread to the jdo-dev alias.
>
>-- Michelle
>
>erik@jpox.org wrote:
>
>
>The ID(String) constructors for the inner classes in the fieldtypes
>package are
>not correct too.
> 
>Quoting erik@jpox.org:
> 
>  
>Hi,
> 
>Some of the object id classes in the tck do not override toString and
>neither
>provide a constructor with String argument or implement Serializable
>interface.
> 
>    
> 
> 
>  
> 
>
>  
>


Mime
View raw message