Mailing-List: contact jdo-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4215C9D5.7020702@spree.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:56:21 +0100
From: Michael Bouschen <mbo.tech@spree.de>
Organization: Tech@Spree Engineering
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Craig Russell <Craig.Russell@Sun.COM>
CC: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: Re: TCK assertion spreadsheet
References: <4213616B.8060501@spree.de> <4213C23F.4050901@sun.com>
 <4213C612.5070400@spree.de> <4213D01E.7030708@sun.com>
 <4214C207.9090905@spree.de> <db4b4afca1bb9c7bdda5add73e44dec1@Sun.COM>
In-Reply-To: <db4b4afca1bb9c7bdda5add73e44dec1@Sun.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Craig,

> Hi Michael,
> 
> Can you please make sure that the info in this message gets sent to the 
> jdo-dev folks, either as an email or by updating a wiki page?

I decided to add the current version of the spreadsheet to the JDO wiki,
because sending a file with suffix .sxc to this email alias does not
work. I added a new section about TCK assertions to the TCK page of the
JDO wiki (see http://wiki.apache.org/jdo/TechnologyCompatibilityKit).

You can download the current version of the spreadsheet from there. I
propose we add the corresponding version of the annotated JDO spec there
for download as soon as Michelle added the query assertions to the spec.

What do you think?

Regards Michael

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Craig
> 
> On Feb 17, 2005, at 8:10 AM, Michael Bouschen wrote:
> 
>> Hi Michelle,
>>
>> attached you find a new version of the spreadsheet with the following
>> changes:
>>
>> - I renamed POM to POModel and updated the summary page.
>>
>> - There was a assertion number typo: line 96 has number A14.6.6, but it
>> should be A14.4.6. The assertion text is. "Keywords must not be used as
>> package names, class names, parameter names, or variable names in 
>> queries."
>>
>> - I reordered the query assertions and hope that they now match the
>> order the assertions appear in the spec. Please let me know if not, 
>> because then I need to update the spreadsheet.
>>
>> - I modified the Permission sheet. I changed the numbering from N22-x 
>> to A22-x and added the missing assertion A22-4.
>>
>> - If you agree I check in this version of the spreadsheet into the Sun 
>> cvs repository.
>>
>> - I uploaded a new version of the apache JDO code to the wiki. It 
>> includes the attached version of the spreadsheet.
>>
>> Regards Michael
>>
>>
>>> Michael Bouschen wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Michelle,
>>>>
>>>> thanks for the feedback. I will update the spreadsheet and send you 
>>>> a new version tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> - In the spreadsheet, you have
>>>>> *AA4.6.12-1*     Result Class Requirements
>>>>>
>>>>> Is the text of this one supposed to be all of that section, up to 
>>>>> Table 6?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, that was the intent. Is this too long for an assertion text? I 
>>>> was not sure, so I just took the section heading .
>>>>
>>> If you think it is best tested iin one test class, then I think it's 
>>> fine.
>>> -- Michelle
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Michael Bouschen        Tech@Spree Engineering GmbH
>> mailto:mbo.tech@spree.de    http://www.tech.spree.de/
>> Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33        Buelowstr. 66           
>> Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012        D-10783 Berlin           
>>
>>
>> <JdoTckAssertionsTable.sxc>
> 
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


-- 
Michael Bouschen		Tech@Spree Engineering GmbH
mailto:mbo.tech@spree.de	http://www.tech.spree.de/
Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33		Buelowstr. 66			
Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012		D-10783 Berlin