Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-jdo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 14824 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2005 15:29:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2005 15:29:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 52834 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2005 15:29:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jdo-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list jdo-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 52793 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2005 15:29:20 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from mail.spree.de (HELO miraculix.spree.de) (62.154.194.149) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 07:29:18 -0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (merlin.spree.de [172.16.1.107]) by miraculix.spree.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j1FFT9O00680; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:29:09 +0100 Message-ID: <42121545.4090805@spree.de> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:29:09 +0100 From: Michael Bouschen Organization: Tech@Spree Engineering User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Craig Russell , Michelle Caisse CC: jdo-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Assertion numbers in renumbered JDO spec chapters Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Craig, hi Michelle, some chapters of the JDO spec are renumbered from 1.0 to 2.0: Chapter JDO 1.0 JDO 2.0 Extent 15 19 JDO Reference Enhancer 20 21 Interface StateManager 21 22 JDOPermission 22 23 I noticed from version 2005-01-14 of the JDO 2.0 spec on the assertions have been renumbered to follow the new chapter numbers, e.g. all the extent assertion are renumbered from A15.x to A19.x. Is this on purpose? If yes, we need to adapt the spreadsheet JdoTckAssertionsTable.sxc and the TCK test classes. We would need to include the old and the new assertion number into the test classes, because we want to use the existing test cases for JDO 1.0 and JDO 2.0. What do you think? Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen Tech@Spree Engineering GmbH mailto:mbo.tech@spree.de http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin