db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: TCK assertion spreadsheet
Date Sat, 19 Feb 2005 01:05:00 GMT
Hi Michael,

On Feb 18, 2005, at 2:56 AM, Michael Bouschen wrote:

> Hi Craig,
>
>> Hi Michael,
>> Can you please make sure that the info in this message gets sent to 
>> the jdo-dev folks, either as an email or by updating a wiki page?
>
> I decided to add the current version of the spreadsheet to the JDO 
> wiki,
> because sending a file with suffix .sxc to this email alias does not
> work. I added a new section about TCK assertions to the TCK page of the
> JDO wiki (see http://wiki.apache.org/jdo/TechnologyCompatibilityKit).
>
> You can download the current version of the spreadsheet from there. I
> propose we add the corresponding version of the annotated JDO spec 
> there
> for download as soon as Michelle added the query assertions to the 
> spec.

Small issue with the spec. It is under Sun license control. I will have 
to consult Sun Legal to figure out what to do here. Is it an issue to 
use the spreadsheet in conjunction with a non-assertion version of the 
spec?

Craig
>
> What do you think?
>
> Regards Michael
>
>> Thanks,
>> Craig
>> On Feb 17, 2005, at 8:10 AM, Michael Bouschen wrote:
>>> Hi Michelle,
>>>
>>> attached you find a new version of the spreadsheet with the following
>>> changes:
>>>
>>> - I renamed POM to POModel and updated the summary page.
>>>
>>> - There was a assertion number typo: line 96 has number A14.6.6, but 
>>> it
>>> should be A14.4.6. The assertion text is. "Keywords must not be used 
>>> as
>>> package names, class names, parameter names, or variable names in 
>>> queries."
>>>
>>> - I reordered the query assertions and hope that they now match the
>>> order the assertions appear in the spec. Please let me know if not, 
>>> because then I need to update the spreadsheet.
>>>
>>> - I modified the Permission sheet. I changed the numbering from 
>>> N22-x to A22-x and added the missing assertion A22-4.
>>>
>>> - If you agree I check in this version of the spreadsheet into the 
>>> Sun cvs repository.
>>>
>>> - I uploaded a new version of the apache JDO code to the wiki. It 
>>> includes the attached version of the spreadsheet.
>>>
>>> Regards Michael
>>>
>>>
>>>> Michael Bouschen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Michelle,
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks for the feedback. I will update the spreadsheet and send 
>>>>> you a new version tomorrow.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> - In the spreadsheet, you have
>>>>>> *AA4.6.12-1*     Result Class Requirements
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is the text of this one supposed to be all of that section, up to

>>>>>> Table 6?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, that was the intent. Is this too long for an assertion text? 
>>>>> I was not sure, so I just took the section heading .
>>>>>
>>>> If you think it is best tested iin one test class, then I think 
>>>> it's fine.
>>>> -- Michelle
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Michael Bouschen        Tech@Spree Engineering GmbH
>>> mailto:mbo.tech@spree.de    http://www.tech.spree.de/
>>> Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33        Buelowstr. 66           
>>> Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012        D-10783 Berlin
>>>
>>> <JdoTckAssertionsTable.sxc>
>> Craig Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
> -- 
> Michael Bouschen		Tech@Spree Engineering GmbH
> mailto:mbo.tech@spree.de	http://www.tech.spree.de/
> Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33		Buelowstr. 66			
> Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012		D-10783 Berlin			
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Mime
View raw message