db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michelle Caisse <Michelle.Cai...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Assertion numbers in renumbered JDO spec chapters
Date Tue, 15 Feb 2005 22:10:03 GMT
I'm fine with either approach.  I think you're right about the problem 
with the JDO1 spec, so let's change the numbers back in the 2.0 spec.

-- Michelle

Michael Bouschen wrote:

> Hi Michelle,
>
> I thought about this again and meanwhile I'm not sure whether we 
> should do the renumbering of the assertions. It is a lot of work 
> changing the spreadsheet and the corresponding TCK test classes. But 
> what concerns me more is that all the TCK test cases we have today are 
> valid  JDO 1 and JDO 2 tests. For JDO 1 they refer to an annotated 
> spec that uses the old numbering. This means we would have to maintain 
> both the old and the new numbers in the test cases.
>
> So I propose to keep the old numbers, even if they do not match the 
> chapter numbers of the new spec. What do you think?
>
> Regards Michael
>
>
>> Yes, that does need to be done.  I can do that when I have my turn at 
>> the spreadsheet.
>>
>> -- Michelle
>>
>> Michael Bouschen wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Craig, hi Michelle,
>>>
>>> some chapters of the JDO spec are renumbered from 1.0 to 2.0:
>>>   Chapter                JDO 1.0     JDO 2.0
>>>   Extent                    15          19
>>>   JDO Reference Enhancer    20          21
>>>   Interface StateManager    21          22
>>>   JDOPermission             22          23
>>>
>>> I noticed from version 2005-01-14 of the JDO 2.0 spec on the 
>>> assertions have been renumbered to follow the new chapter numbers, 
>>> e.g. all the extent assertion are renumbered from A15.x to A19.x. Is 
>>> this on purpose? If yes, we need to adapt the spreadsheet 
>>> JdoTckAssertionsTable.sxc and the TCK test classes. We would need to 
>>> include the old and the new assertion number into the test classes, 
>>> because we want to use the existing test cases for JDO 1.0 and JDO 2.0.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Regards Michael
>>
>>
>>
>
>


Mime
View raw message