db-jdo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian McCallister <bri...@chariotsolutions.com>
Subject Re: Database (was: RE: Questions)
Date Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:42:49 GMT
Even better =)

-Brian

On Jan 14, 2005, at 2:58 PM, Craig Russell wrote:

> Just to clarify, we want to make it as easy as possible for JDO 
> vendors to run TCK against all their supported databases. That's why 
> we want the ddl generator that can be configured by the test run 
> person.
>
> I don't think it makes sense for a compliant JDO implementation to 
> only run against a SQL92 database.
>
> Craig
>
> On Jan 14, 2005, at 11:51 AM, Brian McCallister wrote:
>
>> For the TCK, it is probably safe to specify any SQL92 compliant 
>> database, and we are just careful about the DDL. For the 
>> implementation of JDO it is pointless to only work against one 
>> database =)
>>
>> -Brian
>>
>> On Jan 14, 2005, at 2:40 PM, Matthew T. Adams wrote:
>>
>>> The problem with being able to run against any database is the
>>> difference in SQL dialects.  While I would like the ideal, I don't 
>>> know
>>> that we have the resources to actually pull it off.  Remember, time 
>>> is
>>> of the essence here; the specification is nearly complete, but can't 
>>> be
>>> officially final until the RI & TCK are done.
>>>
>>> --matthew
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Brian McCallister [mailto:brianm@apache.org]
>>>> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 11:17 AM
>>>> To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Questions
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I would suggest Derby or in-memory HSQLDB for system tests =) That
>>>> said, i would definitely recommend making it really easy to run 
>>>> tests
>>>> against any supported database. Ideally a one line config change in
>>>> build process, or override via an ant -D switch.
>>>>
>>>> -Brian
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 14, 2005, at 1:55 PM, Matthew T. Adams wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>  
>>>>> A few questions:
>>>>>  
>>>>> * When will someone be uploading the next update to the private JDO
>>>>> area?
>>>>> * Is there a preferred IDE that we should use in order to lessen 
>>>>> the
>>>>> impedance while getting started?
>>>>> * Have we selected a particular database to test against?
>>>>>  
>>>>> --matthew
>>>>>  
>>>>> Matthew T. Adams
>>>>> Corporate Technical Advisor & Senior Consultant
>>>>> Mobile:  +1 253 732 1051
>>>>> Phone:  +1 206 331 3833
>>>>> Fax:  +1 360 937 9616
>>>>> matthew.adams@xcalia.com
>>>>> P.O. Box 24163
>>>>> Federal Way, WA  98093
>>>>> www.xcalia.com
>>>>>  
>>>>> <image.tiff> 
>>>>> Xcalia helps businesses address the challenge of Enterprise
>>>>> Information Access in a heterogeneous environment.  We provide
>>>>> products and services that facilitate the two-way exchange of
>>>>> information between individuals, mission-critical applications, and
>>>>> databases.  Our customers enjoy improved performance, reduced
>>>>> operating and development costs, faster time to market, and
>>>>> rejuvenated legacy systems.
>>>>>  
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>


Mime
View raw message