db-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jean T. Anderson" <...@bristowhill.com>
Subject Re: Apache DB subproject proposal: JDBM
Date Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:59:54 GMT
[resending to general@db ... I didn't spot 
jdbm-general@lists.sourceforge.net cc'd on the original. Also, I'm 
seeing Alex's post now, expressing his interest to make a commitment, 
which is excellent.]

Hi, Cees,

JDBM certainly looks interesting!

One clarification about process is the project would still enter 
incubation, but sponsored by Apache DB.  On graduation, it would then 
join Apache DB as a subproject -- or possibly even as its own top level 
project. (For example, Apache Derby and JDO were sponsored by Apache DB, 
and graduated as DB subprojects. Apache Cayenne was sponsored by Apache 
DB, but graduated as a TLP. ) Exact destination gets determined at 
graduation time -- but talk of graduation is leaping way too far ahead 
for this discussion.  :-)

The Incubator proposal template will help guide discussion on this list:

  http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#proposal-template

You can add a JDBM proposal to the Incubator wiki:

  http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/

I'd especially like to hear more about your thoughts regarding this 
comment:

> There have been some concerns about the continuity of the package,
> although the original contributors are still active.

Apache is about community -- and no project graduates from the Incubator 
without demonstrating that it has a community diverse and strong enough 
to manage that code base moving forward. You stated a commitment to keep 
JDBM alive -- how about the other contributors? --I'm keying in on this 
risk mentioned in the template:

  
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#template-orphaned-products

> I sincerely hope the Apache DB project will consider adoption of the 
> code base.
>   

Again, Apache is about communities. We just need to make sure that 
everyone understands that.

Since I pulled out a couple comments, possibly without adequate context, 
I'm including your entire original post down below.

I look forward to hearing more about JDBM.

regards,

-jean


Cees de Groot wrote:
> (Currently: http://jdbm.sourceforge.net/)
>
> JDBM is an 8-year old open source library currently under a custom
> (original-BSD-style) license created by me in 2000 as the result of
> some chat with folks from Intalio and extended by a number of persons
> since then, most notably Alex Boisvert. It mainly aims to give similar
> functionality as GDBM but it adds transactions and btrees/htrees. As
> its goals were (and are) simplicity and robustness, after an initial
> flurry of development the package has been mostly stable and is in
> use/has been used by a number of high profile projects
> (http://jdbm.sourceforge.net/JDBM-Powered.html).
>
> There have been some concerns about the continuity of the package,
> although the original contributors are still active. ApacheDS already
> includes a (temprary) fork in the code base, and the main question the
> mailing list receives is along the line "does it still work?" (answer:
> yes, it does - that fact that the stable release is 3 years old means
> that we haven't received any serious bug reports since then, I figure
> ;-)).
>
> While we were discussing the future of JDBM on SourceForge (people
> want to move to Codehaus because of the better tools), Emmanuel
> Lecharny (ApacheDS) suggested that we'd consider Apache DB as a new
> home, and I think it is an extremely good idea for obvious reasons
> (continuity, exposure, peace of mind for Apache DS and other users).
>
> JDBM still fills a good niche, IMO, and would be a worthwhile addition
> to the Apache DB project. At the moment, I'm busy modernizing JDBM:
> - Move from Ant to Maven (mostly done);
> - Move from Junit3 to Junit4;
> - Move to JDK1.5+, most notably by adding generics.
> - Move from jdbm.* to a package name that is in accordance with the
> rules of ibiblio et al. for release.
> - Re-license under ASL/MIT/BSD ("something in that particular corner
> of the open source licensing jungle").
> The first three points are underway, the package rename depends
> partially on its new home, and re-licensing requires some discussion
> and a vote but the contributors so far are quite relaxed on licensing
> (how refreshing!).
>
> Personally, as OC, I am very much committed to keeping JDBM alive. I
> have a bit over 2 decades of experience with working in Free
> Software/Open Source Software environments (starting with an fast
> ANSI.SYS replacement, distributed over Fidonet, in the '80s :)), among
> others I contributed to early Linux kernels, helped with the port of
> Java to Linux as a member of the Blackdown team, ran the
> Linuxdoc/SGMLtools projects and I have been active in various
> Smalltak-related communities, most notably the Squeak community
> (squeak.org). So I hope I qualify the "open source experience"
> requirement. As to the other main contributors, I leave it to them to
> chime in.
>
> I sincerely hope the Apache DB project will consider adoption of the code base.
>
> Regards,
>
> Cees
>   


Mime
View raw message