db-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Maes" <jm...@materialogic.com>
Subject RE: Evaluating the 'Open Sourcing' of Daffodil DB
Date Wed, 01 Sep 2004 14:57:58 GMT
Is anyone currently in contact with IBM over this project?  Who has taken
the lead on it so far?



-----Original Message-----
From: Uday Parmar [mailto:uday.parmar@daffodildb.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 2:10 AM
To: general@db.apache.org
Subject: Re: Evaluating the 'Open Sourcing' of Daffodil DB

James,

Thats the latest I could find. It doesn't really add to what we already
know. Am sending it anyway   ;0)

Links:

http://www.asiacomputerweekly.com/acw_ViewArt.cfm?Magid=1&Artid=24738&Catid=
8&subcat=75

http://news.com.com/IBM+to+make+Java+database+open+source/2100-7344_3-529102
5.html?tag=nefd.top

http://searchdomino.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid4_gci1000676,
00.html


Link from theserverside.com:

http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=27721


Cheers,
Uday

----- Original Message -----
From: "James Maes" <jmaes@materialogic.com>
To: <general@db.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 3:40 AM
Subject: RE: Evaluating the 'Open Sourcing' of Daffodil DB


>I haven't heard any more news about cloudscape.  Does anyone have any
> details on it?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rodney Waldhoff [mailto:rwaldhoff@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 5:03 PM
> To: general@db.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Evaluating the 'Open Sourcing' of Daffodil DB
>
> On Sat, 28 Aug 2004, Uday Parmar wrote:
>
>> However, the issue that come into my mind is that ASF already has a
>> similar project running under the Derby banner. We understand that ASF
>> is not averse to adopting projects in which there is some functionality
>> overlap with an existing project. However, I still wanted to understand
>> members thoughts on how Derby would affect our chances of being selected
>> by ASF.
>
> I don't believe that the presence of Derby (or Axion) should adversely
> affect the evaluation of Daffodil.  We (the ASF *and* Daffodil) should
> consider how Daffodil/Derby/Axion might inter-relate, but a Daffodil
> proposal should primarily be considered on its own merits.


Mime
View raw message