db-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uday Parmar" <uday.par...@daffodildb.com>
Subject Re: Evaluating the 'Open Sourcing' of Daffodil DB
Date Wed, 01 Sep 2004 07:23:29 GMT
Thanks for the response Rodney.

I also agree that a project should be considered only on its merits (or lack 
of the same). The *is-there-some-synergy-between-x-y-and-z* concern would 
(and should) follow later.

Much appreciated.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rodney Waldhoff" <rwaldhoff@apache.org>
To: <general@db.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 3:32 AM
Subject: Re: Evaluating the 'Open Sourcing' of Daffodil DB

> On Sat, 28 Aug 2004, Uday Parmar wrote:
>> However, the issue that come into my mind is that ASF already has a 
>> similar project running under the Derby banner. We understand that ASF is 
>> not averse to adopting projects in which there is some functionality 
>> overlap with an existing project. However, I still wanted to understand 
>> members thoughts on how Derby would affect our chances of being selected 
>> by ASF.
> I don't believe that the presence of Derby (or Axion) should adversely 
> affect the evaluation of Daffodil.  We (the ASF *and* Daffodil) should 
> consider how Daffodil/Derby/Axion might inter-relate, but a Daffodil 
> proposal should primarily be considered on its own merits.

View raw message