Mailing-List: contact general-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@db.apache.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609)
In-Reply-To: <3FE36B27.5030007@apache.org>
References: <3FE0C07F.8000607@apache.org> <3FE15005.5040902@web.de>
  <3FE1B8FF.7010704@apache.org>  <20031218081322.H44854@minotaur.apache.org>
 <1071765798.4272.31.camel@localhost.localdomain>
 <3FE209C2.6040908@apache.org> <3FE2A706.8000704@web.de>
 <20031219110837.G11669@minotaur.apache.org> <3FE36B27.5030007@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <D59B9E04-3269-11D8-9B37-000A95782782@forthillcompany.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Brian McCallister <mccallister@forthillcompany.com>
Subject: Re: [sql] move from commons sandbox to db or db-commons?
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:25:14 -0500
To: general@db.apache.org

If we are looking to expand the scope to include not just DDL  
generation, you can put me down. I need a good general dynamic-query  
builder for SQL and this project looks like a good place to build it =)

-Brian

On Dec 19, 2003, at 4:18 PM, __matthewHawthorne wrote:

> Rodney Waldhoff wrote:
>> Specifically, I think what you'd want to do, just like you would at
>> jakarta-commons, is submit a proposal based upon the example listed at
>> <http://db.apache.org/commons/ 
>> charter.html#Example%20Package%20Proposal>
>> If we are unable to rouse a quorum of 3 developers on the db-commons  
>> list,
>> the DB PMC could step in and name additional committers, likely
>> including you, as an existing jakarta-commons committer.
>> Assuming the other sql developers (if any, I haven't really dug into  
>> it)
>> are in favor of moving to db-commons, I know I'd vote +1 (as a db-c
>> committer).  Jason and James would make three, if they'd like.
>
> Sounds good.  I'll write this up soon.
>
> Unfortunately, I was not one of the primary developers of this  
> component, so I don't have the intricate knowledge that they have.   
> I've
> become more of a user and maintainer who has an interest in seeing the
> project promoted.  I am, however, interested in learning more about
> the code and improving it, if possible.
>
> Is there anyone else willing to be listed as a committer for this  
> component?  I'd appreciate it ;)
>
>