Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 9714 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2003 17:05:21 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Dec 2003 17:05:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 77044 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2003 17:05:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-general-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 77005 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2003 17:05:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: general@db.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 76993 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2003 17:05:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.fridayfives.net) (209.137.167.162) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Dec 2003 17:05:14 -0000 Received: from kamajii.forthill.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C8201F457 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2003 12:05:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from [172.20.1.50] (pcp03522784pcs.limstn01.de.comcast.net [68.39.64.92]) by mail.fridayfives.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D301F43E for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2003 12:05:16 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609) In-Reply-To: <3FE471DD.5010108@apache.org> References: <3FE471DD.5010108@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <0F9221CC-330F-11D8-A3ED-000A95782782@forthillcompany.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Brian McCallister Subject: Re: [sql] move from commons sandbox to db or db-commons? Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 12:07:58 -0500 To: general@db.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.609) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Dec 20, 2003, at 10:59 AM, __matthewHawthorne wrote: > I think this seems interesting. I've never had a need for such a > thing myself, but if you have, and others agree that it's a good idea, > then I think it should be included. Both Torque and OJB, as well as any EJB CMP solution have implemented something of this sort, aside from anything else that has been done. More often it is done via simple string concatenation, but those solutions tend to be fragile, particularly if prepared statements need to be bound =) -Brian