Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact db-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list db@apache.org Received: (qmail 72030 invoked from network); 9 May 2002 18:46:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.nextance.com) (65.105.205.82) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 May 2002 18:46:42 -0000 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Hello X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 11:45:25 -0700 Message-ID: <458473676F1AC74A84EAB2F22004DA6D2A0357@mail.nextance.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Hello Thread-Index: AcH3iLcXTbfj2XwTRTS9A0dFEr3nfgAALHxQ From: "Scott Sanders" To: X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Geir is absolutely right here. Poolman is a huge product, regardless of = the implementation. We say here at apache that the community is important, and PoolMan = arguably has probably the largest user community with the exception of = httpd itself. This is a very powerful thing. I am 100% behind supporting PoolMan as = the keystone for db.apache.org, even though most of you probably would = not. Scott > -----Original Message----- > From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:geirm@adeptra.com]=20 > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:40 AM > To: db@apache.org > Subject: Re: Hello >=20 >=20 > You don't get it - Poolman has a huge user base. Many=20 > companies (all I regularly consult for, and they were using=20 > it before I showed up), the DOD, etc, etc, etc. If the mood=20 > is to just discard to start fresh with untested, unused code,=20 > that's fine - Poolman can stay where it is. History has=20 > repeatedly shown the value and importance of mindshare and=20 > momentum. Don't discard that for technical superiority, as=20 > that can be added over time. >=20 > The point of bringing poolman is in support of one of the=20 > principles of the ASF - to ensure that open source projects=20 > can survive their initial developers. In this case, the=20 > initial developer did the right thing in one way, and got=20 > hung by it - he kept the # of committers to 1 (himself)=20 > because of the LGPL and wanted the freedom. That means we=20 > don't have to fight with anyone for clear title to the code,=20 > but have to boostrap the developers. That=B9s the cost. >=20 > That said, with Poolman you get a *huge* commercial user=20 > base. That means that we can take advantage of the brand to=20 > incorporate good things created here at Jakarta. However,=20 > whatever is done has to be managed carefully to keep things=20 > compatible and stable. >=20 > geir >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Geir Magnusson Jr. > Research & Development, Adeptra Inc. > geirm@adeptra.com > +1-203-247-1713 >=20 >=20 >=20