Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B062CD5EB for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76284 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2012 10:37:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 75993 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2012 10:37:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-user@db.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for derby-user@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 67322 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2012 10:33:31 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 545757.30180.bm@omp1018.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1343730780; bh=NR1XaL5Iu6TtlMu8uX5dWYRs78CHYkC+9OMWuXwLJmo=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Reply-To:From:To:Subject:Date:Organization:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Content-Language:Thread-Index; b=eng0IMZDKNtx77r0hBqaV48j1kd2+tnx6pQBlSAwp4+jtpCAuWQuYP2I/X2KI5NNhzJ5eyDuRVUrm4UQPRyVvHqoYjs8uQL8u57rSC4kYayt4bVr1T+hBtLlzzR4vcRAzxtedBwSxhipTwCwjA/sgQgIwcMQLjSLMDvh5/us3k0= X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: kC5PVEYVM1ka1aEVKserEjryihPUk8VFnQ.Y67n2wpu6848 W773kW6nxaGLswhUEE9kYAbL3DgvLpzSMEWYEcatS5yX_yE7RwsvNE8UBBA_ eMC_pH4XSf.ujE9KDmNCmJSQXE64t.w_9qrZ2J.ZLxvehRKoX.DVs70OcfYZ K4VFXZ0s6n0ByeTM3bbis8Cqs7iVb2aGFwxuWqpPCpdnrwb6y48SX4HCyJDu vTiB9eqN.AH87Lv7MzENKf7kex2IZhs1HEFefvzS8tqD7fA5lKafq7d_tYTk tybTbvAFMMoO8Z4pxvqzzbub.oYtTf0kyZST9Mr0O1hBXCcgGOu_NoFuvrI1 CPYilU7XPR3Pse2douPFS_tW5.2PGdCRc7OiPzfTAtaLXrHwTzppMwb.kGeX ayCx6ekj2C7GzGqHkjFdGdl_vSPqO_rYH1GpTuQTLireR X-Yahoo-SMTP: EWoIHdqswBAurM1L7vJFxs9_vvoZorONjVmVZtmC Reply-To: From: "John I. Moore, Jr." To: Subject: Derby 10.9.1.0 Incompatible with "Substituted" Drives on Windows Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 06:32:57 -0400 Organization: SoftMoore Consulting Message-ID: <004301cd6f07$dace2690$906a73b0$@net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0044_01CD6EE6.53BC8690" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Content-Language: en-us Thread-Index: Ac1vB8az1pZU7PbkRHqROrmgqj9axA== X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0044_01CD6EE6.53BC8690 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Derby Users and Developers, I have an application that has used Derby (with the Network Server) for years, and overall I have been extremely pleased. However, I ran into a problem when trying to upgrade to 10.9.1.0. I have three computing environments that I work in, which can be thought of a development, test, and production. For reasons not worth the trouble of explaining, these three environments are slightly different, but until the latest release of Derby I could make them appear to be very similar by the use of the Windows "subst" command, which associates a path with a drive letter. For example, the command "subst K: C:\SomeDir" makes the system appear to have a "K" drive, which in reality is simply mapped to the directory SomeDir on the C drive. All previous versions of Derby handled databases on this substituted K drive without any problems, but version 10.9.1.0 breaks on it. I was able to get around this problem by setting up a virtual drive using a different approach, so now I have been able to upgrade Derby, but I wanted to point out the problem is case others have encountered it. John Moore ------=_NextPart_000_0044_01CD6EE6.53BC8690 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Derby Users and Developers,

 

I have an = application that has used Derby (with the Network Server) for years, and = overall I have been extremely pleased.  However, I ran into a problem = when trying to upgrade to 10.9.1.0.

 

I have three = computing environments that I work in, which can be thought of a = development, test, and production.  For reasons not worth the = trouble of explaining, these three environments are slightly different, = but until the latest release of Derby I could make them appear to be = very similar by the use of the Windows “subst” command, = which associates a path with a drive letter.  For example, the command = “subst K: C:\SomeDir” makes the system appear to have a = “K” drive, which in reality is simply mapped to the = directory SomeDir on the C drive.  = All previous versions of Derby handled databases on this = substituted K drive without any problems, but version 10.9.1.0 breaks on = it.  I was able to get = around this problem by setting up a virtual drive using a different = approach, so now I have been able to upgrade Derby, but I wanted to = point out the problem is case others have encountered = it.

 

John Moore

 

 

------=_NextPart_000_0044_01CD6EE6.53BC8690--