Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31520 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2010 18:15:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Sep 2010 18:15:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 59546 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2010 18:15:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 59477 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2010 18:15:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-user@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 59470 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2010 18:15:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:15:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of patrick@eaze.org does not designate 212.54.42.166 as permitted sender) Received: from [212.54.42.166] (HELO smtpq3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) (212.54.42.166) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:15:38 +0000 Received: from [212.54.42.151] (helo=smtp19.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ova2H-00060J-Mj for derby-user@db.apache.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:15:17 +0200 Received: from d57d3d12.static.ziggozakelijk.nl ([213.125.61.18] helo=[192.168.1.13]) by smtp19.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ova2H-0002T4-5j for derby-user@db.apache.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:15:17 +0200 Message-ID: <4C8FBBB4.4030200@eaze.org> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:15:16 +0200 From: Patrick Holthuizen User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100328) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derby Discussion Subject: Re: question: is is possible to identify open resources? References: <4C8B3AE1.9030909@eaze.org> <4C8E1ECD.4080302@oracle.com> <4C8FABEE.2020703@eaze.org> <4C8FB886.9000602@eaze.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-ID: 1Ova2H-0002T4-5j X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-SpamCheck: geen spam, SpamAssassin (niet cached, score=-2.6, vereist 5, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -2.60, SPF_PASS -0.00) X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-From: patrick@eaze.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No > What I mean is that there may be a wrapper implementation of the JDBC > spec that will envelope the classes you specify. Often this is done > with a change in DBUrl, something like "jdbc:tracingdriver:(my > original jdbc url)". Many pooling implementations take this approach > as well. > > Thank you very much for your suggestion.