Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 34875 invoked from network); 22 May 2010 13:17:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 May 2010 13:17:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 14819 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2010 13:17:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 14783 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2010 13:17:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-user@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 14776 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2010 13:17:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 13:17:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [32.97.110.153] (HELO e35.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.153) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 13:17:06 +0000 Received: from d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.228]) by e35.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o4MDAA3p004258 for ; Sat, 22 May 2010 07:10:10 -0600 Received: from d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (d03av05.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.85]) by d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o4MDGWXA118214 for ; Sat, 22 May 2010 07:16:32 -0600 Received: from d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o4MDGW2M019668 for ; Sat, 22 May 2010 07:16:32 -0600 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sig-9-48-123-68.mts.ibm.com [9.48.123.68]) by d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o4MDGVkN019643 for ; Sat, 22 May 2010 07:16:32 -0600 Message-ID: <4BF7D933.3030500@sbcglobal.net> Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 06:16:35 -0700 From: Kathey Marsden User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: derby-user@db.apache.org Subject: Re: Full roaming vapor embedded server References: <417325.34556.qm@web31810.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <417325.34556.qm@web31810.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040108030803060206060300" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040108030803060206060300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 5/21/2010 6:50 PM, Geoff hendrey wrote: > Hi, > > ...I assume "full roaming vapor" *was* a Ghost Busters reference. Ha! > Yes. I was thinking of Ghost Busters and should have included proper notation. Network Server coming and going and moving around processes while hiding inside a Java API, reminded me of that and I thought the name might make it more clear that it is an unconventional and as far as I know untested configuration. Thanks for the ideas. Kathey --------------040108030803060206060300 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 5/21/2010 6:50 PM, Geoff hendrey wrote:

Hi,

...I assume "full roaming vapor" *was* a Ghost Busters reference. Ha!

Yes. I was thinking of Ghost Busters and should have included proper notation. Network Server coming and going and moving around processes while hiding inside a Java API, reminded me of that and I thought the name might make it more clear that it is an unconventional and as far as I know untested configuration.

Thanks for the ideas.

Kathey
--------------040108030803060206060300--