Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 53168 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2010 12:06:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Mar 2010 12:06:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 49424 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 12:05:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 49383 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 12:05:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-user@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 49376 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2010 12:05:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:05:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of masoodmortazavi@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.172] (HELO mail-pv0-f172.google.com) (74.125.83.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:05:30 +0000 Received: by pvg2 with SMTP id 2so495728pvg.31 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:05:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=BCPuHHqXLxuWhXUboMKkRSsaw3QV96vfNkyXzqxGqyQ=; b=Gu6Gf4yzVzN8dt9hzUd1FO/eB6kIS5P9jMpTlJ+JaiX7iK9pgTHa+Uwl8zQDxmpqVc 6v0egCkEZsqDxisBT1ArQJPY2tl3pVh8uqCrZFLidWIGG07DXJ8SSZGvZME/n5Gjs9CA Vx0Q/sHBpwQCpKQidSYOo6PWgcxdRqVlYGL2M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Zlj1Jv6QHRYzGRVPbbXQ4ltDvYRp3JtBiy7n5Wl5ruJ9l1zv9bXn76+PrzBp5wO6qm oc7p4wtJYuOnh2+JrIVlNI7s8LHYgX3sUPqd4TpRCQXKZGLe2R9LDPmTr43u9Tk0Hys2 vuzVX73mv2ee4fGzOPX55BuG5G0SJkD/BE9R8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.248.20 with SMTP id v20mr2887734rvh.153.1268395510287; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:05:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:05:10 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: # of derby instances embedded in a JVM ... From: Masood Mortazavi To: derby-user@db.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd0ec32d34f4b04819957a3 --000e0cd0ec32d34f4b04819957a3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I am wondering about any limitations regarding the number of Derby instances that can be embedded in a JVM ... (assuming adjustments to heap-size, etc., have been made) ... Has anyone on this list actually tried this successfully, in an installation? If you have, what kind of configurations did you have to use/set, and to what extent did you go? - m. --000e0cd0ec32d34f4b04819957a3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am wondering about any limitations regarding the number of Derby instance= s that can be embedded in a JVM ... (assuming adjustments to heap-size, etc= ., have been made) ...

Has anyone on this list actually tried this = successfully, in an installation?

If you have, what kind of configurations did you have to use/set, and t= o what extent did you go?


- m.

--000e0cd0ec32d34f4b04819957a3--