db-derby-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick Hillegas <Richard.Hille...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Is Derby.jar really built using javac?
Date Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:44:45 GMT
Hi Gili,

I have been told that Dyre is on vacation for a couple weeks. I am 
afraid you will have to wait a while for the definitive answer to your 
question.

Regards,
-Rick

Rick Hillegas wrote:
> Hi Gili,
>
> I have pinged him.
>
> Regards,
> -Rick
>
> cowwoc wrote:
>> Can you please refer him to this post?
>>
>> Gili
>>
>>
>> Rick Hillegas-2 wrote:
>>  
>>> Hi Gili,
>>>
>>> I do not believe that Eclipse was used to build 10.4.1.3. However, 
>>> the definitive word would have to come from the 10.4.1.3 release 
>>> manager, Dyre Tjeldvoll.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> -Rick
>>>
>>> cowwoc wrote:
>>>    
>>>> The version in question is 10.4.1.3.
>>>>
>>>> Gili
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rick Hillegas-2 wrote:
>>>>        
>>>>> Hi Gili,
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you tell us what release of Derby is causing you problems? I 
>>>>> built the distributions for the following releases and I did not 
>>>>> use Eclipse to build any of these distributions. I believe that 
>>>>> the release notes for these distributions accurately reflect the 
>>>>> environment that I used:
>>>>>
>>>>> 10.2.1.6
>>>>> 10.2.2.0
>>>>> 10.3.1.4
>>>>>
>>>>> Hope this helps,
>>>>> -Rick
>>>>>
>>>>> cowwoc wrote:
>>>>>            
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can someone please confirm whether derby.jar is really built using
>>>>>> javac
>>>>>> as
>>>>>> the website indicates? It seems the latest version might have been
>>>>>> built
>>>>>> using the Eclipse compiler, and this causes problems for Proguard:
>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5124830
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can someone please confirm whether javac is being used and if not

>>>>>> fix
>>>>>> it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thank you,
>>>>>> Gili
>>>>>>                   
>>>>>             
>>>>         
>>>
>>>     
>>
>>   
>


Mime
View raw message