db-derby-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick Hillegas <Richard.Hille...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Is Derby.jar really built using javac?
Date Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:08:16 GMT
Hi Gili,

I have pinged him.

Regards,
-Rick

cowwoc wrote:
> Can you please refer him to this post?
>
> Gili
>
>
> Rick Hillegas-2 wrote:
>   
>> Hi Gili,
>>
>> I do not believe that Eclipse was used to build 10.4.1.3. However, the 
>> definitive word would have to come from the 10.4.1.3 release manager, 
>> Dyre Tjeldvoll.
>>
>> Regards,
>> -Rick
>>
>> cowwoc wrote:
>>     
>>> The version in question is 10.4.1.3.
>>>
>>> Gili
>>>
>>>
>>> Rick Hillegas-2 wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Hi Gili,
>>>>
>>>> Can you tell us what release of Derby is causing you problems? I built 
>>>> the distributions for the following releases and I did not use Eclipse 
>>>> to build any of these distributions. I believe that the release notes 
>>>> for these distributions accurately reflect the environment that I used:
>>>>
>>>> 10.2.1.6
>>>> 10.2.2.0
>>>> 10.3.1.4
>>>>
>>>> Hope this helps,
>>>> -Rick
>>>>
>>>> cowwoc wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Can someone please confirm whether derby.jar is really built using
>>>>> javac
>>>>> as
>>>>> the website indicates? It seems the latest version might have been
>>>>> built
>>>>> using the Eclipse compiler, and this causes problems for Proguard:
>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5124830
>>>>>
>>>>> Can someone please confirm whether javac is being used and if not fix
>>>>> it?
>>>>>
>>>>> thank you,
>>>>> Gili
>>>>>   
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>   
>>>       
>>
>>     
>
>   


Mime
View raw message