db-derby-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick Hillegas <Richard.Hille...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Is Derby.jar really built using javac?
Date Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:40:37 GMT
Hi Gili,

I do not believe that Eclipse was used to build 10.4.1.3. However, the 
definitive word would have to come from the 10.4.1.3 release manager, 
Dyre Tjeldvoll.

Regards,
-Rick

cowwoc wrote:
> The version in question is 10.4.1.3.
>
> Gili
>
>
> Rick Hillegas-2 wrote:
>   
>> Hi Gili,
>>
>> Can you tell us what release of Derby is causing you problems? I built 
>> the distributions for the following releases and I did not use Eclipse 
>> to build any of these distributions. I believe that the release notes 
>> for these distributions accurately reflect the environment that I used:
>>
>> 10.2.1.6
>> 10.2.2.0
>> 10.3.1.4
>>
>> Hope this helps,
>> -Rick
>>
>> cowwoc wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Can someone please confirm whether derby.jar is really built using javac
>>> as
>>> the website indicates? It seems the latest version might have been built
>>> using the Eclipse compiler, and this causes problems for Proguard:
>>> http://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5124830
>>>
>>> Can someone please confirm whether javac is being used and if not fix it?
>>>
>>> thank you,
>>> Gili
>>>   
>>>       
>>
>>     
>
>   


Mime
View raw message