db-derby-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From cowwoc <cow...@bbs.darktech.org>
Subject Re: Is Derby.jar really built using javac?
Date Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:49:52 GMT


Can you please refer him to this post?

Gili


Rick Hillegas-2 wrote:
> 
> Hi Gili,
> 
> I do not believe that Eclipse was used to build 10.4.1.3. However, the 
> definitive word would have to come from the 10.4.1.3 release manager, 
> Dyre Tjeldvoll.
> 
> Regards,
> -Rick
> 
> cowwoc wrote:
>> The version in question is 10.4.1.3.
>>
>> Gili
>>
>>
>> Rick Hillegas-2 wrote:
>>   
>>> Hi Gili,
>>>
>>> Can you tell us what release of Derby is causing you problems? I built 
>>> the distributions for the following releases and I did not use Eclipse 
>>> to build any of these distributions. I believe that the release notes 
>>> for these distributions accurately reflect the environment that I used:
>>>
>>> 10.2.1.6
>>> 10.2.2.0
>>> 10.3.1.4
>>>
>>> Hope this helps,
>>> -Rick
>>>
>>> cowwoc wrote:
>>>     
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Can someone please confirm whether derby.jar is really built using
>>>> javac
>>>> as
>>>> the website indicates? It seems the latest version might have been
>>>> built
>>>> using the Eclipse compiler, and this causes problems for Proguard:
>>>> http://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5124830
>>>>
>>>> Can someone please confirm whether javac is being used and if not fix
>>>> it?
>>>>
>>>> thank you,
>>>> Gili
>>>>   
>>>>       
>>>
>>>     
>>
>>   
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-Derby.jar-really-built-using-javac--tp18677264p18695833.html
Sent from the Apache Derby Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message