Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 63181 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2007 14:33:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Sep 2007 14:33:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 96406 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2007 14:33:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 96378 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2007 14:33:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-user@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 96367 invoked by uid 99); 3 Sep 2007 14:33:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 07:33:52 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of paulschein@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.237 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.237] (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.237) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 14:33:49 +0000 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id m7so741305nzf for ; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 07:33:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=r2ms+zzsBAv0xfKtMm8oz0xK/RPLL6mCM8Ynu/bGjKzrtoZt024+jPS6l1QFVa7nKrNCXhR9FzcL+qOugdmw0FzAP5a5Cq1eGZ40/meTphP49E0UnsiOxxAIuGbUTpSoLngoHDZUiUGH0wRbSnK8n3AsKTv9JAxbhltDH/Utbsk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=dTuNaa7eC0KTVVHQoJ/powRJoW+6TQJvvDwEZtDcl8gSxc7Jq6l1E6cQrTcwdu/nVDBpCP09ICnkkISSUEs91PylDu+qufX7oMyxac0TBVz1SaQuA5UhDPE9tg4cbfC/tz0HaSwRIpcM9mN7jmYRWW/uyskVyVjUR5lpkNc3eg8= Received: by 10.65.54.9 with SMTP id g9mr2526265qbk.1188830008014; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 07:33:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.47.11 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Sep 2007 07:33:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 15:33:27 +0100 From: "Paulo Jesus" To: "Derby Discussion" Subject: Question on benchmarks on derby. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I have been looking for benchmarks used on Derby. We have tried TPC-W on Derby 10.2.2(server mode) and was not a viable teste. This test have many IN statements with multilevel querys and max rows statements. The optimizer doesn't make the best choices, there are many table scans over indexed columns. And have some memory leak. So isn't good for this version. We have also tried PolePosition benchmark. Better results but too simple test. I wonder what benchmarks have been in use by the Derby team. TPC-B? And were can i find the source of those tests. To test new features on code what are the recommended benchmarks? And for a generic application? Thanks. PJ