Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 95205 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2007 17:40:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Aug 2007 17:40:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 81827 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2007 17:39:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 81800 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2007 17:39:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-user@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 81789 invoked by uid 99); 28 Aug 2007 17:39:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:39:56 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [32.97.182.141] (HELO e1.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.141) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:40:44 +0000 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l7SHdQ2Y003976 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:39:26 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.5) with ESMTP id l7SHdQ7Z677128 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:39:26 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l7SHdQUl014827 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:39:26 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sig-9-48-106-76.mts.ibm.com [9.48.106.76]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l7SHdPIm014722 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:39:26 -0400 Message-ID: <46D45E11.2060105@sbcglobal.net> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:40:33 -0700 From: Kathey Marsden User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (Windows/20070809) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derby Discussion Subject: Re: Backward compatibility question References: <56a83cd00708281032n1bbdcc60saaff7e7c6ebe147d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <56a83cd00708281032n1bbdcc60saaff7e7c6ebe147d@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org David Van Couvering wrote: > I know I should know this, but I just want to be sure. If you upgrade > a DB from 10.2 to 10.3 (e.g. hard upgrade), I am assuming you can > still use a 10.2 driver against that database, is that correct? > > Nope. Hard upgrade is a path of no return. Kathey