db-derby-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dag.Wan...@Sun.COM (Dag H. Wanvik)
Subject Re: default (0)
Date Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:12:32 GMT
Mark Thornton <mthornton@optrak.co.uk> writes:

> The Derby documentation (10.3
> http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/10.3/ref/rrefsqlj30540.html#rrefsqlj30540)
> has this
> [ [ WITH ] DEFAULT { ConstantExpression | NULL }
>
> Which indicates that something more than just a literal is
> accepted. So perhaps that documentation should be updated.

Yes, you are right. I checked the Derby grammar, and it *is* more
restrictive.

Thanks for spotting this!

Regards,
Dag

Mime
View raw message