Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30221 invoked from network); 11 May 2007 21:19:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 May 2007 21:19:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 60074 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2007 21:19:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 60045 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2007 21:19:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-user@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 60034 invoked by uid 99); 11 May 2007 21:19:38 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 May 2007 14:19:38 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [198.185.18.46] (HELO mx03.lexisnexis.com) (198.185.18.46) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 May 2007 14:19:30 -0700 Received: from mailgate2.lexis-nexis.com ([138.12.44.45]) by mx03.lexisnexis.com with ESMTP; 11 May 2007 17:19:09 -0400 Received: from lngdayexcp001.legal.regn.net (smtpgate.lexis-nexis.com [138.12.18.80]) by mailgate2.lexis-nexis.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l4BLJ7Z2004856 for ; Fri, 11 May 2007 17:19:09 -0400 Received: from LNGDAYEXCP01VB.legal.regn.net ([138.12.18.65]) by lngdayexcp001.legal.regn.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2499); Fri, 11 May 2007 17:19:07 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: SQL Exception: Container xxx not found Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:19:06 -0400 Message-ID: <9EED580D3663414F82602B9664AE02713BA17B@LNGDAYEXCP01VB.legal.regn.net> In-Reply-To: <4644D30E.1020405@amberpoint.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: SQL Exception: Container xxx not found Thread-Index: AceUC7nF8u7kmt9/QkCqLieAiOhEQAABkC8g References: <9EED580D3663414F82602B9664AE02713BA170@LNGDAYEXCP01VB.legal.regn.net> <4642603B.6080908@gmail.com> <9EED580D3663414F82602B9664AE02713BA173@LNGDAYEXCP01VB.legal.regn.net> <46436FFC.3090706@gmail.com> <9EED580D3663414F82602B9664AE02713BA179@LNGDAYEXCP01VB.legal.regn.net> <4644D30E.1020405@amberpoint.com> From: "Parker, Patricia \(LNG-CON\)" To: "Derby Discussion" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 May 2007 21:19:07.0478 (UTC) FILETIME=[02734760:01C79412] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 138.12.44.45 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Bryan, I've done just that. Thanks Patty -----Original Message----- From: Bryan Pendleton [mailto:bpendleton@amberpoint.com]=20 Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 4:33 PM To: Derby Discussion Subject: Re: SQL Exception: Container xxx not found > events, and it appears that the problem is that the bulk load CALL > SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_IMPORT_DATA (?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?) is not entirely > finishing before I try to query the table it is populating. I would > expect to get a locking exception, or something of that nature, but the I think I would expect to get a locking exception, too. Perhaps you could file an enhancement request in Jira, with the information that you've gathered, explaining what you think the behavior ought to be. http://db.apache.org/derby/DerbyBugGuidelines.html thanks, bryan