Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 82201 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2007 20:01:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Apr 2007 20:01:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 42191 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2007 20:01:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 42173 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2007 20:01:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-user@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 42162 invoked by uid 99); 10 Apr 2007 20:01:45 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:01:45 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.229.153.74] (HELO nussmtp01.ironmtn.com) (216.229.153.74) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:01:38 -0700 Received: from ([10.130.4.162]) by nussmtp01.ironmtn.com with ESMTP id KP-GTT06.53752333; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:00:29 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Asychronous Replication Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:00:22 -0400 Message-ID: <145D98CA0348A6458EC5604B5284470801740EC6@NUMEVP03.na.imtn.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Asychronous Replication Thread-Index: Acd7qt+L58QrtHPuSqW+ij8n/g/hHQ== From: "Chabot, Jerry" To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C77BAA.DF8B53F3" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C77BAA.DF8B53F3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0D=0AI'm considering options for asynchronous replication=2E A low cost op= tion is to freeze the source and target databases,=0D=0Asynchronize the fil= es using rsync (one way) and unfreeze the databases=2E Freezing is acceptab= le given the expected=0D=0Ausage=2E=0D=0A=0D=0AMy concern is existing clien= ts of the target database may see stale data=2E Is there a need to flag the= target clients that =0D=0Athe files have changed?=0D=0A=0D=0ADoes anyone s= ee any technical issues with this approach?=0D=0A=0D=0A-Jerry=0D=0A=0D=0A= =0D=0A=0D=0A-----------------------------------------=0D=0AThe information = contained in this email message and its attachments=0D=0Ais intended only f= or the private and confidential use of the=0D=0Arecipient(s) named above, u= nless the sender expressly agrees=0D=0Aotherwise=2E=0D=0ATransmission of em= ail over the Internet is not a secure=0D=0Acommunications medium=2E If you = are requesting or have requested the=0D=0Atransmittal of personal data, as = defined in applicable privacy laws=0D=0Aby means of email or in an attachme= nt to email, you must select a=0D=0Amore secure alternate means of transmit= tal that supports your=0D=0Aobligations to protect such personal data=2E=0D= =0AIf the reader of this message is not the intended recipient and/or=0D=0A= you have received this email in error, you must take no action=0D=0Abased o= n the information in this email and you are hereby notified=0D=0Athat any d= issemination, misuse or copying or disclosure of this=0D=0Acommunication is= strictly prohibited=2E If you have received this=0D=0Acommunication in err= or, please notify us immediately by email and=0D=0Adelete the original mess= age=2E=0D=0A ------_=_NextPart_001_01C77BAA.DF8B53F3 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0D=0A=0D=0A= =0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0AAsychronous Replication=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A
= =0D=0A=0D=0A

I'm considering options for asynchronous repl= ication=2E A low cost option is to freeze the source and target databases,<= BR>=0D=0Asynchronize the files using rsync (one way) and unfreeze the datab= ases=2E Freezing is acceptable given the expected
=0D=0Ausage=2E
=0D= =0A
=0D=0AMy concern is existing clients of the target database may see = stale data=2E Is there a need to flag the target clients that
=0D=0Athe = files have changed?
=0D=0A
=0D=0ADoes anyone see any technical issues= with this approach?
=0D=0A
=0D=0A-Jerry
=0D=0A

=0D=0A=0D=0A= =0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A



=0D=0A<= P>
=0D=0AThe information contained in this email message and its= attachments
=0D=0Ais intended only for the private and confidential use= of the
=0D=0Arecipient(s) named above, unless the sender expressly agre= es
=0D=0Aotherwise=2E
=0D=0ATransmission of email over the Internet i= s not a secure
=0D=0Acommunications medium=2E If you are requesting or h= ave requested the
=0D=0Atransmittal of personal data, as defined in appl= icable privacy laws
=0D=0Aby means of email or in an attachment to email= , you must select a
=0D=0Amore secure alternate means of transmittal tha= t supports your
=0D=0Aobligations to protect such personal data=2E
= =0D=0AIf the reader of this message is not the intended recipient and/or=0D=0Ayou have received this email in error, you must take no action
= =0D=0Abased on the information in this email and you are hereby notified=0D=0Athat any dissemination, misuse or copying or disclosure of this
= =0D=0Acommunication is strictly prohibited=2E If you have received this
= =0D=0Acommunication in error, please notify us immediately by email and
= =0D=0Adelete the original message=2E
=0D=0A

= =0D=0A ------_=_NextPart_001_01C77BAA.DF8B53F3--