Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99562 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2007 10:19:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2007 10:19:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 38562 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2007 10:19:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 38477 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2007 10:19:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-user@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 38434 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2007 10:19:41 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 03:19:41 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.5.75.124] (HELO elfyard.com) (69.5.75.124) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 03:19:28 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.105] (mail.conceptdata.ro [80.96.217.254]) by elfyard.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l2CAJ6qV013761 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 06:19:06 -0400 Message-ID: <45F52917.2070404@elfyard.com> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:19:03 +0200 From: Valentin Cozma User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061117) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: derby-user@db.apache.org Subject: Derby problem Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on elfyard.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham version=2.63 Dear all, I am using derby version 10.2.2.0 . One of my clients ( the one with the largest database, around 70 MB ) has the following problem : - tries to add something into the application, the application does the job in about 5-10 minutes. It is a very simple task and should take less than 1 second. It adds a receipt in the database. Processor is 100 % used. - after deleting all the receipts, the application performs the same operation normally. I checked the application , I seems correct. I checked on windows and linux, no permission problems. Other sections of the applications perform correctly. I checked in both embedded and network server mode, same problem. I checked with the debugger, the most "used" code is in Derby, something like "PlainSocket" . Questions : - Anybody had a similar problem ? - Is this related to the size of the database ? - Does it seem like a bug in Derby ? I can provide the database if required. Thank you !