Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72275 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2007 18:31:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2007 18:31:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 10349 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2007 18:31:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-user-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 10326 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2007 18:31:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Discussion" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-user@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 10315 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2007 18:31:57 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:31:57 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: 32.97.110.151 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of Stan.Bradbury@gmail.com) Received: from [32.97.110.151] (HELO e33.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.151) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:31:44 -0800 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1NIVNVT014290 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:31:23 -0500 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.2) with ESMTP id l1NIVMvH384996 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:31:22 -0700 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l1NIVM9t027999 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:31:22 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dyn9-72-133-177.usca.ibm.com [9.72.133.177]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l1NIVKsZ027884; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:31:22 -0700 Message-ID: <45DF32F7.7090000@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:31:19 -0800 From: Stanley Bradbury User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derby Discussion CC: vbe-eurogiro@hp.com Subject: Re: Query regarding Table lock References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Nitish Sinha wrote: > > Hi Derby User Team, > > Do you have any updates on this issue? Since it been a long time we > submitted this problem. > Most of our clients are struck because of this problem because this is > a production issue.. > Respond as soon as possible so that we can proceed further.Suggest us > how can we avoid this exception. So that we can implement this in our > application. > I am attaching all previous mails send to you regarding this issue. > > Regards, > Nitish P. Sinha = = = = Hi Natish - I went back in the archives to gather information on this issue and did not find a test case that could be used to investigate this issue. If you need help from members of the community please submit a test case with database and instructions for creating the failure. With this there is a chance someone may be able to assist you. Did you try version 10.2 as previously suggested? Did that help at all? I assume the problem continues to be as you initially described: "A lock could not be obtained within the time requested " ???? I recommend you set up the debugging properties as documented at: http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DebugPropertiesTmpl BE SURE to uncomment the properties in the section: "## If you are encountering locking / concurrency problems " Post the complete derby.log file created when the problem occurs - It will contain the full exception text and lock trace output from the failure. The threads identified by the trace are creating the problem and the application will need to be changed to prevent these codepaths from interfering with each other. This is an application tuning/design issue and so can only be addressed by running and debugging the application that is encountering the timeouts, hence the request for a test case.