db-derby-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "A. Rick Anderson" <ar...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: Limit on number of rows a table can hold?
Date Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:45:17 GMT
But we'd all like to know at what point it rolls over and dies :-)
There's a reason that Derby is free and Oracle, DB2 etc cost budko bucks.

derby@segel.com wrote:
> Billions of rows?
> Sounds like you'll need to rethink your design.
> Sure you can do it, but how efficient will it be?

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Tim Troup [mailto:tim.troup@ed.ac.uk]
>>Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 6:55 AM
>>To: Derby Discussion
>>Subject: Limit on number of rows a table can hold?
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Is there a limit on the number of rows a table can hold?
>>I am planning on using derby as the RDBMS for a system that will
>>require tables to hold billions of rows.
>>
>>Thanks, Tim
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
A. Rick Anderson


Mime
View raw message