db-derby-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ryan Bobko" <r...@ostrich-emulators.com>
Subject RE: Limit on number of rows a table can hold?
Date Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:54:51 GMT
Even if you need billions of rows, are you sure you want that in an
embedded database? I'm the biggest fan of Derby I know, but if I'd say
if you're talking about accessing possibly terabytes of data, maybe you
should spring for a complete industrial strength RDBMS.

ry


> 
> Billions of rows?
> 
> Sounds like you'll need to rethink your design.
> 
> Sure you can do it, but how efficient will it be?
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tim Troup [mailto:tim.troup@ed.ac.uk]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 6:55 AM
> > To: Derby Discussion
> > Subject: Limit on number of rows a table can hold?
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Is there a limit on the number of rows a table can hold?
> > I am planning on using derby as the RDBMS for a system that will
> > require tables to hold billions of rows.
> > 
> > Thanks, Tim
> 
> 
> 
> 



Mime
View raw message