Craig L Russell wrote:
>
> On Sep 12, 2006, at 9:49 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>
>>
>> Craig L Russell wrote:
>>> Hi Geir,
>>>
>>> On Sep 12, 2006, at 3:37 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>>>
>>>> I read Rick's note on the 10.2 licensing issue in an archive because of
>>>> strange move to the user list, so sorry for the weird quoting :
>>>
>>> This issue affects users of Derby just as much as developers. Users
>>> counting on a production release of Derby to be used with a production
>>> version of JDK6 with JDBC4 are directly affected by this change.
>>
>> Isn't that the case with every aspect of development?
>
> Nah.
>
> Users care about their bugs and the features that they use, and the
> schedule for the next production release. The topic of discussion is
> about the schedule for the next production release.
>
> It was a judgement call, and I think it was the right one. Should we
> have a vote? ;-)
>
The problem I was pointing out that it was an important topic of concern
to people that have been following on dev. You should give a bit of a
notice before kicking things off like that, IMO.
geir
> Craig
>>
>> geir
>>
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>> Craig Russell
>>> clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>
>>>
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
|